Supreme court votes not to block Heartbeat Act

Texas’ Heartbeat Act was passed on Wednesday and has put an end to the taking of lives after a heartbeat is detected inside the womb.

The Act has made women ineligible to have an abortion after a beat is detected in their womb.

It takes 4 to 7 weeks to detect the heartbeat, and many experts believe that a beat is usually detected in about six weeks.

Countless people took to social media to mark their protest and “rights” groups asked the Supreme court to injunct and suspend the implementation of the law.

The Supreme court however, ruled against granting the injunction. In a 5-4 vote the court decided not to intervene and said legal measures exist to challenge the law.

The decision has been hailed by some and criticized by others, with Democrats and the Left yet again trying to politicize the Supreme court.

In an attempt to make the honorable judges nominated by President Trump controversial, the Left is busy slandering their characters and personal beliefs on social media.

Even a judge who is considered to be “liberal” by the Left wrote a dissenting note that used a harsh tone.

“A majority of justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand,” Justice Sotomayor wrote in her dissenting note.

President Biden too has jumped on the bandwagon in an attempt to divert attention from the mess he has created in Afghanistan, saying the law is hazardous and would damage women’s access to healthcare.

In a statement released by the White House, Biden labelled the law as “extreme” and considers it to violate “the constitutional right established under Roe v. Wade.”

“Today, Texas law SB8 went into effect. This extreme Texas law blatantly violates the constitutional right established under Roe v. Wade and upheld as precedent for nearly half a century.

The Texas law will significantly impair women’s access to the health care they need, particularly for communities of color and individuals with low incomes. And, outrageously, it deputizes private citizens to bring lawsuits against anyone who they believe has helped another person get an abortion, which might even include family members, health care workers, front desk staff at a health care clinic, or strangers with no connection to the individual.

My administration is deeply committed to the constitutional right established in Roe v. Wade nearly five decades ago and will protect and defend that right,” the statement released by the White House read.

He promised to defend the precedent set by Roe v. Wade, which gives women the right to have an abortion until a fetus is viable.

It is unclear how he plans to do that but social media is abuzz urging him to “pack the court.” Which is something the Democrats have long-planned to do, and some are calling this “uproar” an attempt to lay the foundation blocks of it.

Those opposing the law are claiming it to have been implemented by “a minority,” forgetting that it was passed by elected representatives fulfilling their promise.

If they were a minority then they wouldn’t have been elected in the first place or held the factual majority.

Social media is on fire with propaganda against the Supreme court and Texas Representatives. Hundreds of thousands of people and bots are busy voicing their opinions and creating animosity to pave the way for the packing of the court.